I was thinking about the article we discussed yesterday by Alan Knox and I began to wonder more about our church practice and whether it agrees with the Scriptures.  The text I would like to consider this morning is 1 Corinthians 14:27-30

How is it then, brethren? Whenever you come together, each of you has a psalm, has a teaching, has a tongue, has a revelation, has an interpretation. Let all things be done for edification. If anyone speaks in a tongue, let there be two or at the most three, in turn, and let one interpret. 28 But if there is no interpreter, let him keep silent in church, and let him speak to himself and to God. 29 Let two or three prophets speak, and let the others judge. 30 But if anything is revealed to another who sits by, let the first keep silent. For you can all prophesy one by one, that all may learn and all may be encouraged

I’m not interested at this point in discussing the nature of the prophecy in this text. Let’s assume for our context today that the way we apply this is prophetic illumination of the Word of God - a.k.a. teaching the Scriptures to others. There are several things in this text that are in striking contrast to the way we commonly meet together in church.

First, there is more than one person teaching. Churches today commonly put a lot of stock in a seminary graduate and allow him to do all the teaching. The deacons do not teach. The rest of the body does not teach. We definitely do not conduct services in such a way where anyone else is expected to teach. Is this biblical?

Second, the text suggests that the teaching is not a monologue, or one person talking. Rather, it seems that someone says something, and then others respond. There does seem to be a group (two or three) that is expected to handle most of the teaching, but even these really seem to be leaders of a discussion. Also, the text says “let the others judge.” It seems that it is incumbent upon the church as a whole to speak up if the person or persons teaching is saying something contradictory to sound doctrine.

My question is, “Why do our church services look so foreign in comparison to the biblical model?” I think that much of the reason is that it is simply built into our tradition. Just think about the positive aspects to doing things according to the biblical model. What positive things can you see? What negative things can you see? How would we go about changing to meet together in a more biblical way?